Skip to content
In the matter of                                                                
Canyon Fuel Company, LLC.
SUFCO Mine
I.D. No. 42-00089
Petition for Modification


Docket No. M-1999-057-C


PROPOSED DECISION AND ORDER

On May 26, 1999, a petition was filed seeking a modification of the application of 30 CFR 75.360(b)(9) to Petitioner's SUFCO Mine, located in Sevier County, Utah. On June 13, 2000, subsequent to the issuance of MSHA's investigation report, the Petitioner submitted comments requesting that the proposed alternative method be amended and that the modification be expanded to address 30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9). The Petitioner alleges that the alternative method outlined in the amended petition will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded by the standard.

The petition, as amended, requests the modification of the same standard and proposes the same alternative method as previously granted to the company's Skyline Mines No. 1 and No. 3 by the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO) for Docket No. M-96-119-C, issued March 26, 1998, and finalized Aril 26, 1998.

MSHA personnel conducted an investigation of the petition and filed a report of their findings and recommendations with the Administrator for Coal Mine Safety and Health. After a careful review of the entire record, including the petition and MSHA's investigative report and recommendation, this PDO is issued.

Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law

The amended alternative method proposed by the Petitioner(and as amended by MSHA) will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners under 30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9).

The amended petition applies only to electrical installations and compressors in remote areas used in providing power to pumping installations. The petitioner has not requested modification of standards 30 CFR 75.344(a)(2) or 75.340(a)(1)(i) and (ii) or (iii). However, the proposed alternative method of compliance with the petitioned standard [30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9)] exceeds several provisions of those standards in that: a) the installation must be ventilated with intake air which is directed immediately to a return aircourse or to the surface [required by 30 CFR 75.340(a)(1)(i)]; b) the installations must also be monitored by an Atmospheric Monitoring System (AMS) meeting the requirements of both 30 CFR 75.340(a)(1)(ii) and (ii); and, c) the sensors installed to monitor compressors must provide visual and audible alarm at a located outside and on the intake side of the enclosure as well as on the continuously manned surface location.

MSHA review of the petitioner's proposed alternative method found three items missing as compared to the special terms and conditions for granting the company's Skyline Mines Nos. 1 and 3 modification of 30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9). Those items are considered essential to the modification providing the same measure of protection as the standard and are included in the special terms and conditions in the order section of this PDO. MSHA finds the statement "Pumpers who are also certified persons shall only preshift examine for themselves" important to reinforce the requirement that whenever persons other than the pumper are scheduled to work in the remote areas, a normal preshift examination, made within the hours of the scheduled shift / 8-hour interval, is required [see Paragraph 2(c)]. In addition, MSHA's investigation report finds that Paragrahs 4 and 5, which require MSHA inspection of the AMS and electrical installation prior to implementation of the alternative method and require the mine operator to submit a revised Part 48 training plan for District Manager approval, are necessary. The terms and conditions have also been updated to reflect the final rule change to 30 CFR 75.360 in which "shift" is replaced by "8-hour interval" and the requirement that mine operators establish the 8-hour intervals of time subject to the required preshift examinations.

On the basis of the petition and the findings of MSHA's investigation, Canyon Fuel Company, LLC. is granted a modification of the application of 30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9) to its SUFCO Mine.

ORDER

Wherefore, pursuant to the authority delegated by the Secretary of Labor to the Administrator for Coal Mine Safety and Health, and pursuant to Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C., sec. 811(c), it is ordered that Canyon Fuel Company, LLC.'s Petition for Modification of the application of 30 CFR 75.360(a)(1 and 2) and (b)(9) in the SUFCO Mine is hereby: Any party to this action desiring a hearing on this matter must file in accordance with 30 CFR 44.14, within 30 days. The request for hearing must be filed with the Administrator for Coal Mine Safety and Health, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

If a hearing is requested, the request shall contain a concise summary of position on the issues of fact or law desired to be raised by the party requesting the hearing, including specific objections to the proposed decision.

A party other than Petitioner who has requested a hearing shall also comment upon all issues of fact or law presented in the petition, and any party to this action requesting a hearing may indicate a desired hearing site. If no request for a hearing is filed within 30 days after service thereof, the Decision and Order will become final and must be posted by the operator on the mine bulletin board at the mine.



_________________________________
Michael J. Lawless
Deputy Administrator
  for Coal Mine Safety and Health