Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government.

Petition - Docket No. 2005-069-C

MSHA Docket No. M-2005-069-C                                          M-2009-069-C

 

 

 

 

U.S. Department of Labor                   Office of Administrative Law Judges

11870 Merchants Walk - Suite 204 Newport News, VA 23606

 

(757) 591-5140

(757) 591-5150 (FAX)

 

Issue Date: 05 December 2007

 

 

 

 

 

Case No.: 2007-MSA-00002

 

In the Matter of:

 

TWENTYMILE  COAL  COMPANY, (FOIDEL CREEK MINE, MINE ID 05-03836)

Petitioner,

 

V.

 

MINE SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Party Opposing Petition.

 

 

INITIAL DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 

This proceeding arises under Section l0l(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 ("Act"), 30 U.S.C. 81 l(c) (2000), and its implementing regulations found at 30 C.F.R. Part

44 (Jul. I, 2007). On October 12, 2005, Twentymile Coal Company ("Petitioner") sought modification of 30 C.F.R. § 75.500(d), as it pertains to the use of  battery-powered  non­  permissible surveying equipment. 30 C.F.R. § 75.500(d) provides that:

 

All other electric face equipment which is taken into or used inby the  last crosscut of any coal mine, except a coal mine referred to in § 75.50 I, which has not been classified under any provision of law as a gassy mine prior  to March  30,  1970, shall be permissible.

 

In its Petition  for Modification  ("Petition"),  Petitioner alleged  that, pursuant to  30 C.F.R.

§ 44.4(a)(I), the use of the aforementioned equipment, with certain terms and conditions, was an alternative method of achieving the results of the standard, which would at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded by the standard. After conducting  an investigation of the Petition, MSHA filed a report of its findings and recommendations with the Administrator of Coal Mine Safety and Health ("Administrator"). On January 22, 2007, MSHA issued a Proposed Decision and Order denying the Petition for Modification of 30 C.F.R. § 75.500(d) filed by Petitioner. Thereafter, pursuant to 30 C.F.R.  §  44. 14,  Petitioner,  who disagreed   with   the  denial   of   its   Petition   for  Modification,   requested   a   hearing   before a

 

 


 

 


Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge. Subsequently, on November 30, 2007, having resolved all disputed issues, the parties submitted a  consent  agreement  to the  Presiding  Judge that, in accordance with 30 C.F.R. § 44.27(b) contained the following consent findings and a proposed consent order disposing of the entire matter.

 

Consent Findings

 

I.        In accordance with 30 C.F.R. § 44.27(b)(I), both MSHA and Petitioner agree that  the following consent order shall have the same effect as if made after a full hearing.

 

2.      In accordance with 30 C.F.R. § 44.27(b)(2), both MSHA and  Petitioner agree that the record  on which the following consent order is based consists of the  petition  and  agreement  and  all other pertinent information as set forth in Section 44.27(b)(2).

 

3.      Inaccordance with 30 C.F.R.§44.27(b)(3), Petitioner agrees to waiveany further procedural steps before the Administrative Law Judge and the Assistant Secretary.

 

4.     In accordance with  30 C.F.R. § 44.27(b)(4),  Petitioner  agrees to waive any right to challenge or contest the validity of the consent findings and consent order made in accordance with this consent agreement.

 

5.     Both MSHA and Petitioner agree that the terms and conditions of the following consent order  wi II at all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection afforded by the existing standard under the conditions present at this particular mine.

 

Consent Order

 

Having carefully reviewed the Consent Agreement submitted by the parties, and having concluded that the requirements of 30 C.F.R. § 44.27 have been satisfied, the Presiding Judge accepts the agreement as a just disposition of the issues involved in this matter.

 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's request  for modification  of the application of 30 C.F.R. § 75.500(d) at the Foidel Creek Mine is hereby GRANTED and the Petition for Modification of Twentymile Coal Company is hereby DISMISSED, under the following conditions:

 

a.        Non-permissible surveying equipment shall be used only when equivalent permissible equipment does not exist.  The  non-permissible equipment  to be used is limited to the Leica TC 403, the Geodimeter 620, and equivalent units with batteries having no greater voltage.

 

b.      All non-permissible surveying equipment to be used in or inby the last open crosscut or in the return shall be examined in fresh air outby the last open crosscut prior to being used to ensure the equipment is being  maintained  in  a  safe operating condition. Those checks shall include:


 

 

i.    check the instrument for any  physical damage and the integrity  of the case;

 

ii.    remove the battery and inspect for corrosion;

 

iii.     inspect the contact points to ensure a secure connection to the battery;

 

iv.       reinsert the battery and power up and shut down to ensure proper connections; and

 

v.        check the battery compartment cover to ensure that it  is securely fastened.

 

The results of the inspection will be recorded and retained for one (1) year and available for review by MSHA upon request.

 

c.     A qualified person as defined in existing 30 C.F.R.§75.151 shall continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use of non-permissible surveying equipment in or inby the last open crosscut or in the return.

 

d.     Non-permissible surveying equipment shall not be used  if methane  is detected in concentrations at or above 0.5 percent methane. If 0.5 percent or more  of methane is detected while the non-permissible surveying equipment is being used, the equipment shall be de-energized immediately and  the  non-permissible electronic equipment withdrawn outby the last open crosscut or out of the return.

 

e.       Immediately before the surveying equipment is activated in or inby the  last open crosscut or in the return an air reading will be taken at the location of the equipment to assure that the air movement is at least equal to that required by the ventilation plan as follows:

 

i.       at the location of the last open crosscut, as identified in the ventilation plan, the air reading will be the amount required in the ventilation plan for that location;

 

ii.     in the return the air reading will be the amount required in the ventilation plan for the last open cross cut; or

 

iii.     in any other location, the amount will  be the amount  required in the ventilation plan when roofbolting is occurring.

 

f.      All hand-held methane detectors shall be MSHA approved and maintained in permissible and proper operating condition as defined in existing 30 C.F.R. § 75.320.


 

 

g.     Non-permissible surveying equipment shall not be used when float coal dust  is in suspension.

 

h.     Non-permissible surveying equipment shall  not be used  when coal  production is occurring in the section. All mining in the section shall cease prior to use of the equipment in or inby the last open crosscut or in the return.

 

i.     All surveying equipment shall be used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended safe use practices.

 

j.        Batteries contained in the surveying equipment must be "changed out" or ''charged" in fresh air outby the last open crosscut.

 

k.        Qualified personnel engaged in the use of surveying equipment shall be properly trained to recognize  the hazards and  limitations associated  with the use  of surveying equipment.

 

l.      The non-permissible surveying equipment shall not be put into service until MSHA has initially inspected the equipment and determined that it is in compliance with all the above terms and conditions.

 

m.      Within 60 days after this Decision and Order becomes final, Petitioner shall submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 C.F.R. Part 48 training plan to the Coal Mine Safety and Health District Manager. These proposed revisions shall specify initial and refresher training regarding the terms and conditions  stated above.

 

n.    This grant of modification may be amended or revoked in accordance with 30

C.F.R. § 44.53.

 

SO ORDERED.

 

 

 

Daniel A. Samo, Jr. Administrative Law Judge

 

DAS/mam


 

SERVICE SHEET

 

Case Name: MSHA_v_TWENTYMILE_COAL_COMP_

 

Case Number: 2007MSA00002

 

Document Title: Decision and Order

 

I herebycertify that a copy of the above-referenced document was sent to the following this 5th day of December, 2007:

 

 

 

 

-

DIANA HINTON

LEGAL ASSISTANT

 

 

Counsel for Trial Litigation Div. of Mine Safety and Health

U. S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd, 22nd Floor East Arlington, VA 22209-2247

{flard Copy - Regular Mail}

 

Administrator for Coal Mine Safety & Health

U. S. Department of Labor 1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2424 Arlington, VA 22209-3939

{Hard Copy- Regular Mail}

 

R. Henry Moore, Esq. Jackson Kelly, PLLC

Three Gateway Center, Suite 1340 401 Liberty Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

{Hard Copy - Regular Mail}

 

Allyn C. Davis District Manager

Mine Safety and Health Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

P.O. Box  25367 Denver, CO 80225-0367

{flard Copy - Regular ;'v/ail}


Timothy S. Williams, Esq.

U.S. Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor

Mine Safety & Health Division 1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor Arlington, VA 22209-2296

{Hard Copy - Regular Mail}